Christopher James Huff wrote:

> One possibility would be to allow you to specify a function for any
> float, color, or vector value in the finish...would that satisfy you? ;-)
> There would be a small speed penalty from the overhead of choosing
> between a function and a constant, but an enormous increase in
> flexibility. It would require lots of rewriting though.

That is exactly what I was thinking. Since I have finally "come around" to using
functions, I like them better than plain old pattern identifiers anyway, if only for
consistency's sake. Now if we only had a null pattern identifier to make empy spaces
in normal maps, but that of course is a different story...   ; }

Post a reply to this message